Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Abramoff Begins Here; Where Will It End?

I mentioned a while back that it was only a matter of time before Jack Abramoff would plead guilty to a laundry list of charges. I told you that his tenacles were far reaching, and that no lawmaker who had ever dealt with this man was safe. That has now happened, and the fun has begun. The real question is, where will it all end? Let's start with who this guy is.

Abramoff; Where He Came From

Jack Abramoff began as a young man with lofty goals. It really all began shortly before the 1980 Presidential election, when he was a Young Turk during the Reagan revolution. He helped organize Massachusetts college campuses in 1980, which went a long way towards helping Reagan win that state in the '80 election. He then moved to Washington and managed to take over the College Republicans, turning it into a right-wing activist organization. Abramoff was first connected to Ralph Reed during this period, he in fact put Reed on the map. Reed introduced Abramoff to his future wife, Pam Alexander, who was working with Reed at the time. Later Abramoff ran Citizens for America, a conservative grass-roots group. There he hooked up with Oliver North, and began lobbying Congress on behalf of the Nicaraguan Contras. We all know where that went.

At the same time, Abramoff was secretly accepting money from the Apartheid South African Government. Needing a place to funnel this money, $1.5 million per year, Abramoff started the International Freedom Foundation. At the same time he produced a couple of Hollywood films, namely "Red Scorpion," which included South African soldiers in the cast. Anti-apartheid groups demonstrated at theaters upon the release of this film, which consisted of nothing but anti-communist propaganda. Despite the outrage, he developed "Red Scorpion 2." Neither film proved successful.

When the Republicans gained a majority in both the House and Senate in 1994, Abramoff appeared on the scene as a full time Republican lobbyist. Not surprisingly, he was tied to Newt Gingrich in various ways. Many of his connections were already in place through contacts made previously by his father, Frank, who had spent some time as President of the Diners Club credit card company. Since his father had looked into operating casino's during various times in his career, Abramoff slid right into the Indian casino lobbying game. In 1995 Abramoff hooked up with Tom DeLay at a DeLay fundraiser on Capitol Hill. DeLay was encouraged to become friendly with Abramoff by one of his staffers, who told Delay that Abramoff was going to become an important force in both lobbying and fundraising. Thus, team slime was taking shape.

Abramoff later became a representative of the Pakistani military when Pakistan was attempting to retrieve $600 million that they had paid for military fighters. After the money changed hands from the Pakistani's to the American company that produced the planes, the US Government blocked the sale because of concerns that Pakistan was developing nuclear weapons. The Prime Minister of Pakistan did not know that Abramoff was employed by her government, he had done an end run and gone directly to the Pakistani military, bypassing proper channels.

All the while, Abramoff was becoming friendly with Republicans and a few Democrats and their staffers, mostly members of appropriations committees. In 1999 he attended a golf outing at St. Andrews in Scotland, along with six Republican Senators and their aides. It was then that Abramoff learned how to fund trips for lawmakers with his own money. The first "Abramoff Golf Excursion", funded by Abramoff himself, was for DeLay and his aides and took place at St. Andrews.

While all of this was happening, Abramoff was laying the grounwork for becoming a real player in Washington D.C. He opened two restaurants close to the capitol, leased four arena and stadium skyboxes, bought a fleet of floating casinos, and began a religious school for boys in Maryland. Gotta have a way to entertain clients, and buy politicians, you know.

It's All About Connections

In 2000, Abramoff became a member of the transition team for the Interior Department after Boosh was appointed President. Boosh claims to not know Abramoff, stating only that they may have been at the same functions a time or two. Given the track record for honesty that Boosh has made, who knows whether or not this is true. There is no doubt, however, that Abramoff was well grounded at the Interior Department, having become a good friend of J. Steven Griles, the deputy interior secretary. Another Interior Department employee, Roger Stillwell became close to Abramoff during this time.

Susan Ralston, an Abramoff assistant left his employment to take a job assisting Karl Rove at the White House. Abramoff claims credit for landing her this job, so does Ralph Reed. While the New York Times and Wall Street Journal often noted Abramoff's growing power, he still found it necessary to pay op-ed columnists thousands of dollars to write favorable articles about his clients, mainly Indian Tribes wanting to get into the casino business. Only one columnist has come forward to my knowledge, but he claims to have been paid to write over 2 dozen articles since the mid '90's.

People in Immediate Jeopardy

Five members of the House and Senate appear to be in immediate jeopardy with Abramoff's guilty plea, four Republicans and one Democrat. They all have former staffers on Abramoff's payroll. They are: Tom DeLay, (needs no explanation); Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Montana), the head of the Senate Appropriations panel's Interior subcommittee; Rep. Robert Ney (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Administration Committee; Rep. John Dolittle (R-California), has served on the House committee that oversees Indian tribes; and Sen. Harry Reid, (D-Nevada), Senate Minority leader. Incedentally, Abramoff put Dolittle's wife on his payroll for the planning of one "event."

The Money

The amount of money that Abramoff took from various Indian Tribes alone to buy influence on the Hill is staggering. Between 2000 and 2003, Abramoff received a minimum of $80 million. This is not counting the 50% that he took from his partner, the man ultimately responsible for the takedown of Abramoff, Michael Scanlon. Scanlon charged the Tribes untold millions for "public relations work" in a spin off of the Abramoff lobbying business. They equally divided the profits, and generally did no work for the money.

Indian tribes were not the only victims. Several different "companies" were set up by Abramoff and Scanlon to funnel money through, including the American International Center, which was set up as a "think tank" for the purpose of taking money from foreign entities that they didn't want to "officially represent." I won't mention all of the companies, it really isn't important. What is important is what follows.

The race to distance themselves from Abramoff has begun. Last night, House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Illinois) announced that he was donating all of the money that he received from Abramoff to charity. The amount was somewhere around $67,000. Many others are following suit, attempting to figure out what to do, with some amounts as little as $5,000. I find it amazing that these lawmakers, on both sides of the aisle, are JUST NOW trying to get rid of the money and cover their asses. Since I have known for at least a year that this fiasco would end in a plea deal, surely our elected representatives could have figured that out on their own. Maybe not, maybe they need to read the Real Deal or shoot me an email or something.

I would also give them some additional advice, free of charge. Instead of looking for some charity to give the dirty money too, give it back to the Indian Tribes from which it was stolen. With the unemployment rate, alcoholism rate, educational system and life expectancy of the American Indian being dismal, give them their damn money back.

This will be the biggest scandal ever to hit the US Government, and I hope that it ends the careers of 75 of these scumbags. I know that this will not happen, but I think it would take somewhere around that number to have the positive effect that we need to turn Washington back into a sane environment where the peoples business becomes important again. More likely, a dozen or so members of the House and Senate will end up resigning. Countless numbers of staffers will go down, but that will have no effect on how we are governed. It will only effect who makes up the weekend foursomes.

There are some positives. One is that this marks the end of the Tom DeLay era in politics. He is finished, and should resign his seat immediately. He won't, though, he is arrogant enough to want to stay and fight the indictment that already faces him in Texas. He will find, though, that the little Ronnie Earl skirmish in Texas will be small business compared to where the Abramoff thing leads. Another positive is that I believe that this will speed up the indictment of Karl Rove. Patrick Fitzgerald has nothing to wait for now, so let's get on with it. The third positive is merely a hope. A hope that the Republicans will pay a heavy price for this should we survive to the '06 elections. They have become an out of control, power grubbing monster party, and must go down for this nation to have any chance of survival. Should the American people not toss these bums from office, there is nothing worth saving. Any Democrat that is caught up in this scandal should fall as well. If it were a perfect world, every incumbent would be defeated and we could start from scratch. (I can dream a little, can't I?)

Stay tuned, it's going to be fun to watch. Anyone who saw the way Abramoff was dressed yesterday, should realize that he is not going down alone. He looked like Don Corleone, in a ridiculous hat and trench coat. If I was connected to him in any way, I would probably be on a plane today to some far away place, because he's taking no prisoners. He will make prisoners out of many, however.

As I said before, maybe Jack Abramoff can do something that the American people have not had the will to do as of yet. Create some term limits and clean house in Washington.

Cyclone

20 Comments:

At 9:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

All governments everywhere were/are corrupt. Until populations being governed change what they value in the people who do the governing, it will not change. Let us hope that a change in consciousness takes place. Have to realize that being rich does not make someone benevolent or wise.

 
At 10:55 AM, Blogger qrswave said...

Abramoff is the harbinger of comeuppance on the horizon.

It looks like 2006 will be a milestone in the history of this nation.

 
At 11:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with Murph's comment that all the governments in the world are corrupt. The difference with the corruption in this country is that it was well disguised until the Boosch administration took power. This administration along with their ass clown of a leader are so arrogant, that they didn’t bother to cover their tracks well enough and now all these scandals and all the corruption is coming out. These corrupt bastards deserve to be taken out into the streets and gunned down by a firing squad, unfortunately that will never happen. I agree with Cyclone that around 75 of them would have to be removed for the government to change and I definitely agree with the fact that terms should be set. I would say 2 years terms and not being able to server more than 2 terms like the presidency. Hopefully the sheep will see the light and vote for democrats during the 2006 elections, so we can clean up theses republican scum.

 
At 1:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Greed is human nature. It is in each and every one of us, and until we can escape the greed, governments will be corrupt. We need to embrace that fact, and try to keep it to a minimum. A small amount of corruption will always be there, it is a matter of balancing it against the greater good. The current balance has tipped very, very far from where it should be.

 
At 6:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous and Bone; Essentially, you both are correct. Howevwer, people have been voting for this governmnet since Reagon. That is when it essentially began from my perspective. Disguised their intentions? Naww, don't think so. For me, the very first speech I remember seeing Bush speak appalled me, I actually got chills. I KNEW he was a liar. Look at his facial expressions when he talks. I heard people say he was honest, ethical, and one of us, from the git go. Now, I have no special talents for spotting this deception. It looks to me that what he said appealed to people and whether it was Bush or another Reagan, they got what they wanted. I am sure you know people also who still defend him and feel the country has a good leader and he is being crucified for no good reason. For that matter, how many people that read this forum voted for him and now regret it. Simply put, the American population has been voting for a very long time on the basis of whether a man tells them what they want to hear, not for the truthness, nor on the persons integrity and often on his presentation or looks. These people have turned to marketing agencies to 'market them'. I do hope you understand that is a whole psycological area based on deception and has absolutely nothing to do with honesty or integrity.

We caught a program on TV just a couple of days ago that covered this 'marketing of politicians'. Watered down some, didn't cover Rove, but did get it's point across.

The American population has been been given lies from day one, and they have bought into the lies. Unfortunately, reality soon does it's own adjustment. Happens in personal lives and for politics.

Rule one, there ain't no free lunch. May appear so sometimes, but payment will be extracted somewhere. Any promise of a free lunch by the governemtn or someone who wants control of the government is a liar. Socially this appears in the form of opression by the government, ALWAYS. Whenever you hear promises of this sort, run the other way. Personally, I am unwilling to give up freedom for security. It will never be true, and is a one sided trade off and can never be achieved by any government. Whatever security there is in this world is transient and further, is self made. All a legitimate government can supply you is freedom to deal with it.

 
At 6:24 AM, Blogger cyclone said...

Murph,

Now you know that you can't pick freedom over security, because Boosh says that your security is more important. And he'll spy on you to keep you safe. Straighten up and toe the line, sir. You are sounding like an insurgent!

Cyclone

 
At 6:25 AM, Blogger cyclone said...

qrswave,

2006 is going to be a milestone for something, that's for certain. It may well be the end.

Cyclone

 
At 6:27 AM, Blogger cyclone said...

rp,

Verbiage errors are permissable here. Keep on rollin'.

Cyclone

 
At 6:29 AM, Blogger cyclone said...

Bone,

I totally agree. I think the only solution might be to crash and burn and start over from scratch. Maybe get the priorities right next time.

Cyclone

 
At 8:55 AM, Blogger stoney13 said...

Noticed you mentioned Nicuragua. Here's a little snippet we used to say when I was Over there doing shit I wasn't supposed to at the behest of the SOC

Lock and load and sally forth!
Fun and games with Ollie North!
Ollie's got the guns
Poindexter,s got the cash!
Noriega's the man
That sacks up the stash!

(Alright RP! I know it rips off the old "Burke and Hare" rhyme! But I'm an X convict and we do shit like that!)

Great work! Loved it!

 
At 9:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a mess. Regarding Iraq, I'm reminded of a saying:

If I'm the bank and you owe me $10,000 and don't pay, it's your problem, but if you owe $100M, it's *our* problem.

Bushco went into Iraq to secure the oil and made a bollocks of it, but does that change the fact that we still need to be there to ensure our supply? Don't we need to somehow fix the disaster Bushco created, if only for the survival of our economy? Immediate withdrawl just isn't going to happen. We're stuck, my friends.

What I worry about more than anything is the incompetence of these louts, not their ruthlessness. After all, this sort of thing has been going on forever.

Did Mr. Bush fail his handlers or did his handlers know just what they were getting? How the Abramoff affair shakes out will indicate which is the correct view.

Good post!

 
At 11:21 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Emiliano:

I think your missing the point on oil. Our economy is not sustainable, it contains too many errors in suposition, namely, inifinate growth is sustainable because raw material and energy is infinite, which patently is a not true. Securing the remaining energy is a band aid over a bullet hole and is in conjunction with the attitude of 'I got mine and fuck you'.

National ruthlessness has been a fact of history for sure. Isn't there anything better? What justification can a nation possibly have to obliberate others for a buck? Perhaps if you were on the receiving end of the ruthlessness you would feel different about it.

I understand the dog eat dog mentality. Doesn't mean I have to participate or support it. Cooperation always makes more accomplishments than hard edged competition. Our society has promoted cooperation within groups that compete with other groups for dominance. The consequence being that whatever group comes out on top then dictates what advancements are allowed, which then stiffles advancement. Nope, the free trade, capitalistic system is in the end inefficient and damageing, socially and individually. We are reaping the harvest for the extreme adoption of this structure. The price will be a heavy one.

 
At 12:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Emelio,
What the hell gives the U.S. the right to kill thousands of Iraqis and subject our own troops to carnage so that, what, we can continue to go to the mall? Don't forget that this "non- negotiable lifestyle" that Cheney, et al, espouse is only enriching the swine who have turned our citizenry into vacuous consumers, sold out the productive capacity of the nation, and illicited the contempt of the world. Re-think this thing, Amigo.
The world's supply of oil is running out. We need to conserve it and invest in things like railroads and localized production of food and manufactured goods, not fight a never-ending war over what is left with the blood of our children.

...and, good poem, Rockpicker.

 
At 1:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Murph and Freeacre,

I don't disagree with anything you are saying about the nature of the situation.

But my view still is that we "broke" things in Iraq and we need to fix them. Complete and wholesale withdrawl would not be a good thing for anyone. I'm arguing this from the humanitarian perspective! If we really did pull out, most would predict an all-out civil war along with possible involvement of other oil-producing states and the concomitant severe reduction in oil supplies for the rest of the world - not just us. I note with alarm that we do not seem to be positioned for either pulling out or fixing what's broken.

Besides the probable huge numbers of Iraqi casualties such a civil war would cause, the effect on the agricultural sector would be enormous. I bet an economist could tell us what the trade off might be just in lives and I think that would argue my case better than I have.

If we get moving now and I mean really get moving, perhaps we can do something about our sorry dependence on foreign hydrocarbons before it's too late. Bring back Jimmy Carter and let him run the energy show.

Another thing to think about. Most estimates about the tipping point of oil supplies assume growing economies and increasing population. What if those assumptions were incorrect?

-E

 
At 2:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, Emeliano (and I apologize for mispelling your name previously)I agree that we broke it and now we should fix it. But, I don't think we are fixing it. One hundred and twenty Iraqis were killed today and 50 more just yesterday! They already are in a civil war, and our being there is provoking even more hostility. I hate to leave people who have depended on us and trusted us in the lurch. It's shameful. Just like it was in Vietnam when we left in helicopters while people were begging us to take them with us. Look how we have "fixed" Afganistan. The Taliban (as bogus as they are) almost had wiped out the heroin trade. Now that we took over, it's all back. Let's not kid ourselves here. Despite individual soldier's good intentions, that's not what it is about. They care less about the Iraqis than they did about the people in the New Orleans Superdome. They didn't even watched it on TV!The hostilities that the different factions of Iraq have for each other are based in things we don't have a clue about. Only they can find the solution if there is one. The only way to make peace is to be peaceful. Feed 'em. Give them medical care. We could practice that right here.
And, if the oil doesn't peak? Or somehow the population doesn't grow and the consumption doesn't need to be curtailed? Well, then I guess we'd just have made friends, developed community, stored food and supplies, and switched to local organic food for "nothing." Doesn't sound bad to me.

 
At 3:29 PM, Blogger Dave Watkins said...

Cyclone:

I'd like to congratulate you on having drawn all these people together that have commented here today.

They have made some very good observations and made some excellent points. So they are all to be congratulated also.

In fact these comments are many levels higher than I have read elsewhere.

Now if these keen, intelligent people can channel their efforts and cause bushco to be put out of business sooner rather then later--what a great and NOBLE thing that will be!

 
At 3:41 PM, Blogger Dave Watkins said...

Truly a NOBLE thing!

 
At 6:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Richard Sharpe,

You are too kind sir. And, I do thank Cyclone for the blog. It is of much interest to my wife and myself, and we read with great interest the responses and occassionally throw in our two cents worth.

Ah sir, if I but had the means of changing what appeas to be our political reality, would I dare? Throwing the bums out more often than not results in just as bad or worse bums coming in. We first have to change the value systems used to decide such matters.

The original intent (as I understand it) of our constitution to live and let live was adulterated early on with Manifest Destiny and near genocide of whole cultures and creatures. Not a pretty early history.

Ah well, I follow Noam Chomski's analysis of history and politics rather closely. Think the man has valid things to say about it all. At least it resonates with me.

Thanks again for your comments.

 
At 8:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cyclone,
lol. Almost lost on all of us, seemingly, was your excellent synopsis of Abramoff. As usual, your writing was thorough and comprehensible and much more grounded in it's perspective than the pathetic talking heads on the national "news." Your readers are so articulate and knowledgable themselves that I think we may forget to give credit where credit is due. I add my thanks for your efforts.
Just think how it must feel to be him. He's flattered, lied to, cheated, manipulated, used, screwed, and now betrayed just about every one he has known for years. I wonder if it will ever get to him? Wonder if he will go to prison, or just to one of those "country club" facilities for VIP's. What a blowhole. I bet he's incapable of feeling guilt. Probably the others don't either. Just unhappy to be caught, the swine.

 
At 7:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Although I wish we had never set foot in Iraq, we have to deal with the reality of the situation.

It's time to go. Now, immediately. That country is already in a state of civil war, that we helped create. The loss of human life is tragic, as it always is, but these people need to be left to their own self determination.

That is what freedom and democracy is about isn't it? The right to choose your own path, make your own decisions? By marching down the road our current administration is following we are seeking to take away other sovereign nation's right to make a choice. We are making it for them. That's not freedom, that's fascism.

We need to pull all the troops home. All of them, from everywhere. Burn down the corrupt Congress and start over like Cyclone said. There are no more half measures here that will be effective. The parasites are so entrenched that it is impossible to remove without killing the host.

So, what do we do? I would love to believe that the spoon fed, Television worshipping, obese masses would rally to make lasting change, but I am a realist. Most of the populace in this country currently would not heave themselves off the couch, turn off Jerry Springer, and go into the street to rail against a illegitimate government even if you lured them out with a bucket of KFC and a 12oz of brown gravy.

We, here, making intelligent conversation are in the minority. That is tragic. I'm open to suggestions as to what we can do to improve the situation.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home