Wednesday, January 03, 2007

An Execution By A Sovereign Government? Think Again

There have been so many things happen in the last week that I must admit I am a bit befuddled about where to go next. I am working on something regarding Boosh and the economy, Boosh and the new Congress, and the utter madness that he increasingly displays every day. Today he wants to demand bipartisanship? Amazing. Organizing it all is another matter entirely, so please bear with me just a little longer. I want to scream for help, but my room is soundproof so it wouldn't do any good. Until such time as I can figure out what is most important to do next, here is a short piece that is admittedly a little late in coming.

I can guarantee you that you won't find this angle on the Hussein execution anywhere in the mainstream media.

The Execution of Saddam Hussein By The American Government

If you listened to the latest version from the Boosh spin machine regarding the recent execution of Saddam Hussein, and chose to believe what you heard, it would go something like this. It took only 52 days from the conviction of Saddam Hussein for the murder of 148 Shiite men and boys in Dujail until he was hanged. This includes the completion of the appelate process. He was executed very close to the beginning of Eid, a religious holy period of sacrifice. Some say that the execution was illegal, including Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin, a Kurd, who said the following. "No verdict should (be) implemented during the official holidays or religious festivals." The US government now states that this was the sole doings of the new, sovereign Iraqi government, and that all decisions were made by them. We merely held Saddam until minutes before he was executed, then took custody of his body immediately after and flew him to Tikrit so he could be buried in a dignified manner. (As one who has witnessed an execution along with the aftermath, I can tell you that there is nothing "dignified" about the way the US conducts executions, but that is an entirely different matter) "We would have done it differently," says US military spokesman Major William Caldwell. Oh really? Let's take a look at that.

Although Saddam Hussein refused to wear the customary hood during his hanging, those around him did not. You will have a hard time convincing me that there was no one present who was not an agent for the American government, either hooded or not. If no one was there, how would we have even known that the execution was carried out? How would we have known that Saddam was executed and not scurried away in the early morning hours? Answer, we wouldn't have.

Secondly, does one really believe that justice was done in this case, at least by American standards? Hardly. In our system, it is not unusual for a person to have multiple death sentences, often from different states, though obviously a person can only be killed once. Our need for revenge and supposed "closure" is so great that there is no way that we would have killed this evil tyrant before he at a minimum answered for the many thousands of Kurdish deaths that he was allegedly responsible for. Sounds like that supports the American version of events, right? Think again.

The fingerprints of George W. Boosh and the American government are all over this execution. Had the Iraqi's truly handled this matter on their own, there is no way that they would have broken Islamic law and carried it out so near the beginning of Eid. They would have known the furor that it would create. Sure, the execution would have been done soon, likely on Thursday or Friday of this week. But, no way it would have happened when it did. The al Maliki government is fighting for its very survival, is desperately trying to create peace and avoid things such as this that are obviously going to create chaos and further divide the Iraqi people. The reality was that the masters spoke, and the Iraqi government had no choice but to do what they were told. Oh, the effect was good, I'll give Booshco some credit for that. Somebody smuggles in a cell phone and videotapes the event, then it is leaked to the underground and picked up all over the world. Several people yell offensive things at Saddam throughout, all great drama designed to make one believe that in fact the Iraqi's were in charge. The problem is, it just doesn't wash.

There are many very compelling reasons that the US government wanted Saddam Hussein dead and out of the way BEFORE being tried on the charge of murdering the Kurds many years ago. I'll just mention a couple. Keep in mind, the Dujail murders happened in 1982, years before the Kurdish atrocities. It just so happens that one year later in 1983, Donald Rumsfeld, then working for Ronald Reagan, visited Saddam Hussein in one of his palaces. It was no secret at the time, there are pictures of the two shaking hands that are circulating today. But, Booshco does not want those pictures plastered all over our television sets for the duration of what would undoubtedly be a long trial. Out of sight, out of mind.

Nor do they want to revisit the reasons why Rumsfeld was visiting this brutal dictator at the time. Not that it was a big deal, he was just there to finalize the deal to deliver the very chemical and biological weapons that Saddam would later use on his own people. Of course we didn't intend for them to be used in that fashion, instead expected them to be used on the Iranians. But, when you go to bed with the devil, there is no guarantee who you might wake up with the next morning. Turns out that works both ways, as Saddam found out.

Isn't it ironic how things eventually come full circle? Warning: The following is a mouthful. First, we essentially create Saddam Hussein by supporting him during the Iraq/Iran war, give him weapons of mass destruction, he uses them against the Kurds, we then go to war in the 1990's against him for invading Kuwait, eventually send in inspectors who find and destroy the weapons that we gave him. Later we invade again, lying by claiming that he has the very weapons that we originally provided him yet knew all along that they had been destroyed, saying he is planning to use them on us, we then use the same type of weapons on the Iraqi people we are allegedly "liberating" in Fallujah, depose him, dig him out of a spyder hole, convict and finally execute him.

It's a strange world we live in.

Cyclone

10 Comments:

At 7:31 PM, Blogger RAS said...

Cyclone,
You're right about the madness, and the U.S. government's hands being all over this.
Here's what I wrote the morning after he swung (copied because I'm too lazy to retype it, lol):

High Theater in Baghdad
Saddam swung this morning. Not that this will surprise anyone who hasn't been living under a rock for a while, but I thought I would state the obvious.

I can't even pretend to have sympathy for the man. He was a total monster, after all. A power hungry sociopath at the least, a war criminal, and all the other atrocious things he's been accused of. But let's get real for a second; his fair trial wasn't, his judge was replaced in the middle of the trial, attorneys were assassinated left and right, they didn't even pretend to listen to his appeal, and basically said "go swing". And this is fair?

And then there's his hanging. They denied it was going to happen until it did, everything was done in secret, and the executioner's wore black masks. It happened at dawn no less. This reminds me of some melodramatic western. "As the sun slowly rose above the horizon on the last day of the year and cast the first of its hallowed rays on the High Plains, the condemned man climbed the scaffolding, a resolute look on his craggy, hardened face." Sounds like a Clint Eastwood script doesn't it?

Then there's the statement released from the White House, with a timeline of our Idiot in Chief's activities last night, which was careful to state he went to bed before the execution and was not awakened when it occured. Said statement caused me to snort hot coffee out of my nose. I'd be willing to bet he watched the whole thing on closed circuit TV. (Maybe with popcorn to boot!)

This whole thing has his fingerprints all over it. The "cowboy" who isn't, pretending to deliver justice to the wilds of Iraq. I can't help but wonder though, if he might have felt a chill as he watched this. Saddam was hanged for ordering the deaths of 169 innocent men. A war crime to be sure. But our President has caused the deaths of over 655,000 civilians since he started his little war. Not that I think he'll ever face a war crimes tribunal, mind you. But I wonder if he even noticed the similarities?

 
At 7:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cy,

You are disturbing my brain. Oh my. Now you tell me that the hanging of Hussein is not as it seems, or at least as the media would have us believe it. I am shocked. Why would they not tell it like it is? Would our government really lie to us? sigh, yup strange world we live in.

 
At 12:12 AM, Blogger murph & freeacre said...

The deaths this week of Saddam Hussein, Gerald Ford and James Brown juxtaposed together on the nightly news was just too surreal. The twisted rhetoric of the hanging, shape- shifting stories of the execution, hastily contrived before the history of his involvement with Rumsfeld and Bush was examined, then transmitted by cell phone video - all seemed inutterably hypocritical. Then the irony of Cheney and both Bushes praising Gerald Ford, after Woodward released the interview with Ford stating that the Republicans had gone too far right, he wouldn't have gone to war and that Cheney had become too belligerant...poor Betty was probably reminded why she had been drinking and popping pills in the first place.
And, then James Brown, looking as old and weird as Elvis would have looked if he had lived as long... good grief. And, Tom Brokaw, droning on about the "greatest generation".
Taken together, it all seemed so false and hideous. What a way to start the new year, eh?

 
At 1:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Absolutely outrageous, I've no sympathy with Saddam (although I don't believe in the death penalty) but I couldn't understand why he didn't stand trial for the Halabja chemical attack in 1988. It all makes sense now killing a man in order to avoid media scrutiny, how low can they get.

 
At 7:10 AM, Blogger Palooka's Revenge said...

Cy,

You hit d'nail on d'head again my friend.

From Riverbend @ Baghdad Burning... (I'll meet you 'round the bend my friend, where hearts can heal and souls can mend)...


A Lynching...

It's official. Maliki and his people are psychopaths. This really is a new low. It's outrageous- an execution during Eid. Muslims all over the world (with the exception of Iran) are outraged. Eid is a time of peace, of putting aside quarrels and anger- at least for the duration of Eid.

This does not bode well for the coming year. No one imagined the madmen would actually do it during a religious holiday. It is religiously unacceptable and before, it was constitutionally illegal. We thought we'd at least get a few days of peace and some time to enjoy the Eid holiday, which coincides with the New Year this year. We've spent the first two days of a holy holiday watching bits and pieces of a sordid lynching.

America the savior… After nearly four years and Bush's biggest achievement in Iraq has been a lynching. Bravo Americans.

http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/

I've been reading Riverbend for years now along with her virtual brother, Raed Jarrar who, among other things, had this to say about the claim that "militias had managed to infiltrate the execution chamber...

As if the "team from the interior ministry" is not a gang of militiamen itself! This is not just another pathetic attempt to blame someone else for Al-Maliki and Al-Hakim’s failure and stupidity, it’s another failed attempt to split the anti-occupation coalition by attempting to cause problems between Al-Sadr movement and other Iraqis who were offended by execution-gate.

http://raedinthemiddle.blogspot.com

Imagine that, the highest profile execution since McVeigh where we have 130,000 troops and someone "infiltrated the execution chamber"????

I wonder who could possibly be the "failures" Raed is referring to?

Raed could have put it another way like... "nice try cowboy, but you don't fool us"!!!

DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Both Raed and Riverbend are adament that Maliki is aligned with Muktada al-Sadr who is, of course, the one the hedkling was about.

You might remember the news story a few months ago about an Iraqi who was detained and harrassed at JFK for wearing a T-shirt with the words "We will not be silent"

That was Raed Jarrar....

http://raedinthemiddle.blogspot.com/2006_08_10_raedinthemiddle_archive.html

 
At 7:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Riverbend is also very disappointed by the mainstream media.
While BBC claims celebrations (most streets are empty), CNN manages to get Saddam's last words wrong:

"The moment the noose was around Saddam's neck, they began chanting, in unison, "God's prayers be on Mohamed and on Mohamed's family…" Something else I didn't quite catch (but it was very coordinated), and then "Muqtada, Muqtada, Muqtada!" One of them called out to Saddam, "Go to hell…" (in Arabic). Saddam looked down disdainfully and answered "Heya hay il marjala…?" which is basically saying, "Is this your manhood…?".

Someone half-heartedly called out to the hecklers, "I beg you, I beg you- the man is being executed!" They were slightly quieter and then Saddam stood and said, "Ashadu an la ilaha ila Allah, wa ashhadu ana Mohammedun rasool Allah…" Which means, "I witness there is no god but Allah and that Mohammed is His messenger." These are the words a Muslim (Sunnis and Shia alike) should say on their deathbed. He repeated this one more time, very clearly, but before he could finish it, he was lynched.

So, no, CNN, his last words were not "Muqtada Al Sadr" in a mocking tone- just thought someone should clear that up. (Really people, six of you contributed to that article!)"

http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_riverbendblog_archive.html

Her weblog gives an absolutely staggering view of what is going on in that country, her stories are very much like the stories my parents tell me about how life was during WW2 in the Netherlands (actually worse).

Dutch.

 
At 4:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

From Belgium,

When I got back, from where I had been,
My room looked just the same,
But there was nothing left between,
The nameless and the named.

L. Cohen.

Who of you really believe that it was Saddam that was hanged this week? I will admit that a couple of months of worry and harsh treatment could make the brow furrow and the cheeks hollow but did you have a look at that guy’s teeth? Sadam had two perfect rows of tombstone teeth (no pun intended). This guy’s teeth were all crooked and broken, that’s a hard one to fake. I have no sensible explanation for this. I heard that the real Sadam got out to Belarus before the event or maybe he is rotting in Gitmo or getting the cold beers ready in Paraguay, who is to say? He could even be the next Karl Rove in waiting.

As to a reason for the banality of it all, there is a background assumption going around that the PTB actually don’t want any sort of solution in Iraq. They want a relatively quick slide into hell and it now looks like they are going to toss in the National Guard for good measure.

Did any of you catch the story of James E Dean an ex soldier who served 12 months in Afghanistan? He was suffering from depression and post traumatic stress disorder, what used to be called shell shock. But being ex military he got his call up papers for Iraq. He barricaded himself inside his father’s home and refused to come out and his parents, fearing for his safety called the police. After a lengthy stand off, he agreed to come out peaceably and unarmed whereupon the police shot him dead. Well he was an army sharpshooter and what did it matter that he didn’t have a weapon? I suppose it proves that there aren’t any dissenters in hell.

 
At 6:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Belgium, Thanks for the heads up on the police shooting. I found the story with a google search. This from the Wash. Post;

"Police said Dean stepped outside his front door and pointed a firearm at an officer. Another officer on the scene, believing his colleague was in danger, shot Dean in the chest, they said."

Shooter and his affiliation with the dept. were not identified.

 
At 7:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

From Belgium,

Rockpicker,

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk
/article.asp?ID=5779

 
At 9:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Belgium,
The thought ran through my mind as I watched the innumerable newscasts of the hanging preliminaries that "Isn't this the guy that had all the doubles?" without specifically noticing the teeth.
Amber

 

Post a Comment

<< Home